Now that Beta 2 has been announced and IIS 7 is now publicly available to beta testers on both the Vista and Longhorn platforms, our new portal, IIS.NET is now open and live! Many long hours were spent on this by some great guys here at Microsoft. Be sure to stop by and tell them what you think of the site!
We’re hiring! Take a look at the details below
“Do you love Internet and Web server technologies? Join the IIS UE team and work on the coolest version of Internet Information Services (IIS) ever. IIS 7.0 joins forces with ASP.NET to deliver a Web application development platform that’s getting rave reviews from customers.
We’re looking for a programmer writer to define and deliver essential developer-focused, solution-based documentation for a programming audience. Your responsibilities will include writing API reference topics, conceptual topics about IIS, and code examples that demonstrate product features. You’ll be responsible for multiple feature areas, so good organizational skills and the ability to prioritize your workload are a must.”
Microsoft Learning has put together a great series of training courses which are available now at a substantial discount. Take advantage of the deal while it lasts (sale ends June 30th)!
Also, don’t forget to check out the free training videos for VB.NET Express Edition. They provide a great starting point for anyone looking to break into the Visual Basic .NET market.
Nearly a year ago, I blogged about the fact that I had no “cool” technologies in my house. I didn’t own a single gadget that anyone would consider to be “up to date” by any standard. I didn’t own a PDA, a laptop, or even a modern cell-phone. I didn’t have flat-panel monitors or anything other than a standard 27″ television — with a broken power button at that. I had several computers in the house, but all of them were at least a year and a half old.
I decided after posting that complaint that things were going to change. I released my death grip on my cash that I had been hording and sprung for a new, improved, gadget-savvy image.
Flash forward to today — 11 months after that post. As I got ready to head into work, I closed up my 17″ widescreen HP media center ready laptop and turned off my HP printer/copier/fax. I packed up my Gateway Tablet PC and shoved it into my Microsoft backpack along with my 60GB video iPod, assorted USB flashdrives, bluetooth adapters, folding headphones, and the like. I strapped my 8.1 MegaPixel Nikon digital camera and Audiovox Smart Phone to my belt. I put my Motorola bluetooth hands-free headset on my ear. I walked into the living room and turned off my 50″ Plasma TV and shoved the wireless controllers for my Xbox 360 under the TV stand. I walked out to my car and looked at the windshield cluttered with an XM SkyFi2 satelite radio, a Sirius satelite radio, and a Microsoft Streets and Trips GPS device. Now, I say all of this to point out that I’ve gone from one extreme to another and at no small expense. I sometimes wonder if I should have just hung onto my cash, but in other instances, I really enjoy my products.
I asked myself as I traveled to work this morning “Have I gotten my money’s worth out of these devices? Have they made my life better — or just more expensive?” It seems that many of today’s top technological gadgets are great at overcoming technological problems, but do they really enrich our lives? My Smartphone is one device that I just couldn’t live without. I keep track of my appointments, birthdays, phone numbers and so much more on that little thing. I also keep a copy of Microsoft Pocket Streets and Trips on there — which is a great little tool for getting around. There is no question that this device makes my life easier in today’s society that requires that I know how to contact any number of people, keep track of appointments and schedules that change every hour, or keep me up to date with birthdays of family members all the way on the other side of the country. My camera is great. Photos are so hard for me to keep track of. I keep a few but they are usually buried in boxes that I have to dig for if I want to view them again. I can snap pictures of the mountains out here in the Pacific Northwest and immediately send them to my parents. The camera is a great addition to my “technical family.” That said — there are other devices that just seem to be excessive (Who needs XM and Sirius and an iPod? Could I do without them? Most likely.)
I could go on and on talking about my devices. Instead, I’d like to hear from you. What technologies have made your life better? These could be services, pieces of hardware, or even websites in general. I want to know what technologies make a difference in your everyday life and what technologies have you invested your hard-earned money into that haven’t been worth it.
Sahil has once again shown true insight and provided a list of common diseases found in our industry. Do you have any of these symptoms?
Much has been said about the Mort, Elvis and Einstein controversy over the past few years (yes, years). The past few days have been no exception. One of our MVPs is apparently upset about them, and apparently some employees are not too happy about it either. I’ve waited several days to comment until the screaming stopped. Now that it has, it’s my turn to weigh in. Most of this content about this topic is completely off-base and unfounded. “Why?”, you might ask. That’s because Mort, Elvis, and Einstein don’t exist. That’s right, there is no one person on this planet that is meant to be exhibited by these personas. The names depicted here are meant to represent behaviors — not people. Trying to pigeon-hole people into one of these areas is just a misrepresentation of what the persona was meant to portray.
Mort is not a VB developer, Elvis is not a C# developer, and Einstein is not a C++ developer. Sure, the personas use these analogies because they do fairly closely resemble a large stereotypical audience, but it doesn’t “fit” to anyone. Then again, no description fits more than one developer. These personas don’t drive features and they don’t do anything but serve as reminders that we have different types of developers who need different types of features, documentation, and applications. Don’t think this is true? Ask the average VB developer what a thread is and they may get the “word for word” answer, but a large part of that audience never has wanted to understand the intricate details of thread local storage, differences between the stack and the heap and why those are important in the context of application development. Does that mean that all VB developers don’t care about threading? NO. Once again, there is plenty of evidence that einsteins exist in the VB community as well — “Einsteins” meaning people who want detail! Mort behaviors exist in the C++ community as well. I’m one of the people have have a mort mentality with C++. I know so little about C++ I’m amazed I’m allowed to breath the same air as the folks here at Microsoft. That, indeed, is the Mort side of me.
Several people have asked “Why are there no definitions for these from Microsoft.” And they are hopping mad about it! Quite frankly, its because the personas were not meant to be public information. They were used to help mold and categorize functionality internally, and nothing more. Because of that, the actual documents for these personas are not available externally. If they were, they would also likely be taken out of context.
That said, this won’t be the last discussion about these fictional characters. I imagine we’ll be hearing about them for some time. Just remember to take everything you hear with a grain of salt, and if you think the way we construct software is wrong, by all means RESPOND! Speak up, tell us how you would approach it. Better yet, apply to the team that interests you most and come implement those changes yourself!